VARAIBLE
CONSEQUENCES – IN COMMUNITY OF PROPERTY
CHAPTER 6:
Cases where community of property does
not arise:
In
RSA there is a Rebuttal presumption in community of property – can be
rebutted if proven that:-
·
ANC
·
Valid
Post Nuptial
contract
·
Husband’s
lex domicilli
at time of marriage provides that marriage is OUT. In RSA husband’s lex
domicilli dictates which matrimonial system operates. Therefore if husband from England at time
of marriage and no ANC –the marriage would be OUT in terms of English law. If later immigrate to RSA - still OUT.
·
Black
persons entered into civil marriage governed by section 22(6) of the Black
Administration Act, 38 of 1927. in terms of act auto OUT unless joint
written declaration before a magistrate/com within 1 month prior to the
marriage that they want to marry IN.
Characteristics of Community of
Property:
- Universal
Partnership:
·
spouses
become tied co-owners in undivided and indivisible half-shares of all
assets and liabilities at time of marriage and what accrue after the marriage;
·
At
divorce –all liabilities are settled from joint estate and balance
distributed equally;
·
Estate
Sayle v Com of Inland Revenue.
Content of
Universal Property:
Assets: anything with monetary value-e.g.
immovable property, vehicles, money, jewellery, clothing, interests in
companies, goodwill, furniture, art, appliances, pension interest, policies
with surrender value.
Assets
excluded:
·
In
ANC – can
exclude, fruits of assets fall in joint estate unless excluded, (Any
asset replaces excluded asset also falls outside joint estate, e.g. if a sum of
money is excluded in ANC and she then buys a house- the house is
excluded.) pretium succedi in locum rei,
res sucedi in locum pretii
·
In Will/ deed of donation: - same maxim applies – if
inherit money buy car-car excluded. Again fruits IN unless expressly excluded.
·
Subject
to fideicommissum / usufruct: fruit are IN, because it is a personal right which cannot
alienate. Usufructs cannot be replaced
but fideicom can be replaced as such some of opinion that fideicom replacement
asset falls within estate.
·
Jocalia
(engagement gifts): replacement
assets fall in joint estate.
·
Benefits
under Friendly Society Act, act 25 of 1956: Sec 17 benefits due to a married women
OUT. Probable unconstitutional as discriminates against sex and marital status
·
Non-Patrimonial
damages: Sec
18(a) of Matrimonial Property Act OUT. The replacement of assest of non
–patrimonial damages is not excluded.
·
Personal
injury inflicted by other spouse: Sec 18 of Matrimonial Prop Act also OUT. Only amount of
damages are excluded not necessarily replacement assets.
·
Cost
in matrimonial action:
cost awarded- then outside the joint estate.
·
Proceeds
excluded ito Prevention of Organized Crime Act: sec 50(1) proceeds of unlawful
activities may be forfeited to the state. The forfeited property vests in curator bonis – sells then asset
recovery account.
Attachment of separate assets:
Du Plessis v Pienaar –
creditors of souses married IN can recover from joint
estate. Exclusion of an asset
does not protect asset in case of insolvency.
Liabilities:
Jointly liable therefore
cannot stand surety for each other’s debt.
Includes
maintenance debts - unclear if applicable to ANC delictual debts.
Debts incurred during subsistence of the
marriage:
·
Contractual
debts = incurred during marriage – must recover from joint estate or separate
assets of spouses. Depends on whether consent of other party was obtained (or
required).
·
Delictual
debts = Sec 19 Matrimonial Property Act – must recover 1st from
separate property –if insufficient then from joint estate. When division then adjustment must be made to
other spouse’s estate.
Debts outstanding at dissolution of
joint estate:
·
Contractual
debts = not
paid off can only be recovered from original debtor or 50% can be claimed from
each. If one pays all he/she has right
to claim 50% from other.
·
Delictual
debts = ONLY
CLAIM FROM ORIGINAL DEBTOR.
- Administration
of joint estate:
Before Matrimonial property act husband
had marital power – incur debt etc.
Restriction and violation of dignity as
were inferior to husbands.
Sec 11 of MPA abolished marital power
–replaced with equality. Did not affect acts before act.
Abolishment of Marital power –on / after
1 Nov 1984 – before had 4 years to registration of notarial contract. Or jointly approach court and ask to change
matrimonial property system.
Principle of
equal administration of joint estate;
Marital power replaced by equal admin of
joint estate. Both equal manageing joint
estate – but practical cannot every time request consent –buy bread etc.
therefore any party can perform juristic act =but some acts require consent.
Therefore both restricted eg:
Both consent required: Sec 15(2), 15(30,
17(1) MPA. Different kinds of consent -4
types:
- Prior written consent & attested by 2 witnesses
iro each transaction
separately – (cannot sign power of attorney)
·
Selling/buying
immovable property ( reg @ deeds office).
·
Suretyship
No ratification –no power of attorney
for all acts.
- Written consent & 2 witnesses iro separate
transactions:
·
sell/buy
a mortgage or servitude ( real right of immovable property)
·
receiving
credit ito National Credit Act -34 of 2005.
·
Buy
immovable property under contract of sale.
The act can be ratified – no power of
attorney for all acts.
- Written consent without further requirements:
·
sell/cede
shares /stocks/deposits or investment
·
sell/pledge
assets held mainly as an investment eg jewels , coins.
·
Withdraw
money of other spouse
·
Institute/defend
legal action which does not relate to profession of spouse.
- Oral/Tacit consent:
·
Sell
furniture part of common household;
·
Receiving
money owed to other spouse for remuneration, income, interest on dividends etc.
·
Inheritance
donations, prizes etc.
·
Donation
to a 3rd party.
Acts where
consent is not necessary:
Sec 15 ( 2) –actions in normal course of
profession.
Protective
measures
3rd parties: sec 15(9) did not know or
suspect married in community of property – deemed to have been entered with the
required consent.
Look at Distiilers Corp Ltd v Modise –
surety read legally competent = accept has spouses consent.
Spouses:
Statutory
remedies:
·
Sec
15(9)
provides that if estate suffer loss –rectify when division.
·
Dispensing
with consent
– if cannot obtain and court satisfied good cause sec 16(1). Cloete v Cloete = wife refusal found refusal
was reasonable.
·
Suspension
of spouse’s power:
suspend definite/indefinite period
Must be prejudicial, protect his
interest.
·
Immediate
separation of estate:
if serious prejudice sec 20 ask for immediate separation of joint estate and no
other person will suffer prejudice.
Common law
remedies:
·
based
on fraud
·
the
interdict:
intends to alienate an asset of the joint estate with intention to prejudice the other spouse.
·
Must
not have a suitable alternative remedy.
·
Common
law right @ dissolution of joint estate:
if already alienated then other spouse may have resource when dissolving
the marriage.
·
Actio
Pauliana utilis: if alienated fraudulently claim this action from 3rd
party .
·
Declare
a prodigal: prejudice dignity and
privacy.
Capacity to litigate:
Sec 17 regulate capacity of spouses to
litigate if married IN.
Sec 17(4) – insolvency against both.
Joint debts – sec 17(5) = jointly
/severally.
No comments:
Post a Comment